1. Prerequisites
To understand advanced perception techniques like LiDAR, Liquid Neural Networks, and Vision Transformers, the following foundational concepts are required:
1.1 Mathematics & Linear Algebra
- Vectors & Matrices: Essential for transformations and feature extractions.
- Eigenvalues & Eigenvectors: Used in Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for feature reduction.
- Probability & Statistics: Fundamental for uncertainty modeling and decision-making.
1.2 Machine Learning & Deep Learning
- Neural Networks: Understanding basic architectures like MLPs, CNNs, and RNNs.
- Backpropagation: Essential for training deep networks.
- Attention Mechanisms: Required for Vision Transformers (ViTs).
1.3 Computer Vision & Image Processing
- Feature Extraction: SIFT, ORB, and deep feature maps.
- Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): Foundation for ViTs.
- Object Detection: YOLO, SSD, Faster R-CNN.
1.4 Robotics & Autonomous Systems
- Sensor Fusion: Combining LiDAR, cameras, and IMUs.
- SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping): Used in autonomous navigation.
1.5 Data Structures & Algorithms
- Graph Theory: Used in point cloud segmentation and path planning.
- Optimization Techniques: SGD, Adam, and reinforcement learning.
2. Core Concepts of Advanced Perception
2.1 LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
LiDAR is a remote sensing technology that uses laser pulses to measure distances and create 3D maps.
- Working Principle: Emits laser pulses, measures time taken for return, and constructs a point cloud.
- Types: Mechanical LiDAR, Solid-state LiDAR.
- Applications: Autonomous vehicles, robotics, mapping, and environmental monitoring.
2.2 Liquid Neural Networks (LNNs)
Liquid Neural Networks are biologically inspired neural networks where neuron dynamics continuously evolve over time.
- Key Feature: Adaptive, continuous-time behavior making them robust to changing inputs.
- Difference from Standard Neural Networks: Uses differential equations to model neurons instead of static weights.
- Applications: Time-series predictions, autonomous robotics, sensor fusion.
2.3 Vision Transformers (ViTs)
Vision Transformers apply Transformer architectures to images instead of sequential text.
- Key Concept: Images are divided into patches, which are processed like tokens in NLP.
- Advantage: Captures long-range dependencies better than CNNs.
- Applications: Object recognition, medical imaging, anomaly detection.
3. Why Do These Algorithms Exist?
3.1 Autonomous Vehicles
- LiDAR: Used for 3D environment perception and obstacle detection.
- Vision Transformers: Used for object recognition and lane detection.
- Liquid Neural Networks: Enables fast adaptation to changing road conditions.
3.2 Robotics & Industrial Automation
- LiDAR: Used in SLAM for robot navigation.
- Vision Transformers: Helps in robotic vision for object manipulation.
- Liquid Neural Networks: Enables flexible decision-making in dynamic environments.
3.3 Medical Imaging & Healthcare
- Vision Transformers: Used in MRI and X-ray analysis.
- Liquid Neural Networks: Used for ECG and EEG signal analysis.
4. When Should You Use It?
4.1 When High-Precision Depth Perception is Required
Use LiDAR when depth estimation and 3D mapping are necessary, such as in autonomous driving.
4.2 When Handling Complex Time-Series Data
Use Liquid Neural Networks for adaptive learning in unpredictable environments, such as financial markets and autonomous systems.
4.3 When Handling Large-Scale Image Processing Tasks
Use Vision Transformers when CNNs struggle with long-range dependencies in images, such as high-resolution medical scans and satellite imagery.
5. How Do They Compare to Alternatives?
5.1 LiDAR vs. Cameras vs. Radar
Technology | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
LiDAR | Highly accurate depth perception, robust in low-light conditions. | Expensive, struggles in adverse weather. |
Cameras | Rich color and texture information, cost-effective. | Poor depth estimation, bad performance in low-light. |
Radar | Works in all weather conditions, long-range sensing. | Lower resolution compared to LiDAR. |
5.2 Liquid Neural Networks vs. Traditional Neural Networks
Model | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Liquid Neural Networks | Highly adaptive, excels in real-time decision-making. | Computationally expensive to train. |
Traditional Neural Networks | Well-optimized for static datasets. | Struggles with dynamic, time-varying data. |
5.3 Vision Transformers vs. Convolutional Neural Networks
Model | Strengths | Weaknesses |
---|---|---|
Vision Transformers | Better long-range dependency capture, state-of-the-art accuracy. | Computationally intensive, requires large datasets. |
CNNs | Efficient on small datasets, well-established. | Struggles with long-range dependencies. |
6. Basic Implementation
6.1 LiDAR Point Cloud Processing (Python + Open3D)
The following Python implementation reads a LiDAR point cloud and visualizes it using Open3D.
import open3d as o3d
import numpy as np
# Load a sample point cloud file
point_cloud = o3d.io.read_point_cloud("sample.pcd")
# Visualize the point cloud
o3d.visualization.draw_geometries([point_cloud])
Dry Run: Given a sample point cloud file sample.pcd
:
- The function loads the point cloud from the file.
- The visualization module renders the 3D point cloud.
6.2 Liquid Neural Network for Time-Series Prediction
Below is a basic PyTorch implementation of a Liquid Neural Network.
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.optim as optim
class LiquidNeuralNetwork(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, output_size):
super(LiquidNeuralNetwork, self).__init__()
self.hidden = nn.Linear(input_size, hidden_size)
self.output = nn.Linear(hidden_size, output_size)
def forward(self, x):
x = torch.tanh(self.hidden(x)) # Non-linear dynamics
return self.output(x)
# Sample Data
input_tensor = torch.tensor([[0.5]], dtype=torch.float32)
model = LiquidNeuralNetwork(1, 5, 1)
output = model(input_tensor)
print(output) # Output prediction
Dry Run: Given an input of 0.5
:
- The input passes through a hidden layer with 5 neurons.
- Tanh activation applies a non-linearity.
- The final output layer predicts the result.
6.3 Vision Transformer (ViT) for Image Classification
A basic Vision Transformer (ViT) model using Hugging Face Transformers.
from transformers import ViTForImageClassification, ViTFeatureExtractor
from PIL import Image
import torch
# Load a pre-trained Vision Transformer model
model = ViTForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
feature_extractor = ViTFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
# Load and preprocess an image
image = Image.open("sample_image.jpg").convert("RGB")
inputs = feature_extractor(images=image, return_tensors="pt")
# Perform inference
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(**inputs)
# Print the predicted label
predicted_class = outputs.logits.argmax(-1).item()
print(f"Predicted class: {predicted_class}")
Dry Run: Given an image sample_image.jpg
:
- The image is processed using a Vision Transformer feature extractor.
- The pre-trained ViT model computes the class logits.
- The highest probability class is printed.
8. Time & Space Complexity Analysis
8.1 LiDAR Point Cloud Processing Complexity
- Worst-case Time Complexity: \(O(N \log N)\) (For sorting or spatial indexing, e.g., KD-Tree, Octree)
- Best-case Time Complexity: \(O(N)\) (Linear traversal for basic processing)
- Average-case Time Complexity: \(O(N \log N)\) (Common in nearest neighbor searches, clustering)
Space Complexity
- Raw Point Cloud Storage: \(O(N)\), where \(N\) is the number of points.
- Memory Usage: Depends on resolution; a high-resolution LiDAR scan generates millions of points.
- Optimized Storage (KD-Tree, Octree): \(O(N)\) but requires additional indexing overhead.
8.2 Liquid Neural Networks Complexity
- Worst-case Time Complexity: \(O(N^2)\) (Fully connected recurrent updates for each timestep)
- Best-case Time Complexity: \(O(N)\) (If sparsity and optimizations are applied)
- Average-case Time Complexity: \(O(N^2)\) (For backpropagation through time, BPTT)
Space Complexity
- Weights Storage: \(O(N^2)\), where \(N\) is the number of neurons.
- Activation Storage: \(O(N)\) per timestep.
- Optimization Techniques: Sparse connectivity reduces overhead.
8.3 Vision Transformers Complexity
- Worst-case Time Complexity: \(O(N^2 \cdot D)\), where \(N\) is the number of tokens and \(D\) is embedding dimension.
- Best-case Time Complexity: \(O(N \cdot D)\) (Linear attention mechanisms can improve efficiency).
- Average-case Time Complexity: \(O(N^2 \cdot D)\) (For standard self-attention computation).
Space Complexity
- Token Representation: \(O(ND)\).
- Attention Matrix Storage: \(O(N^2)\) (Can be reduced with sparse attention).
- Layer-wise Storage: \(O(L \cdot N \cdot D)\), where \(L\) is the number of transformer layers.
9. How Space Consumption Changes with Input Size
9.1 LiDAR Space Growth
- Each additional point in the scan increases storage by \(O(1)\).
- Spatial structures like KD-Trees add an indexing overhead of \(O(N)\).
- Compression techniques reduce space but introduce processing overhead.
9.2 Liquid Neural Networks Space Growth
- Increasing hidden neurons results in quadratic growth in space \(O(N^2)\).
- More timesteps require storing additional past states, increasing memory usage.
- Pruning and weight sharing can reduce this significantly.
9.3 Vision Transformers Space Growth
- Increasing image resolution leads to more tokens (\(O(N)\) complexity per layer).
- Higher layers require more attention storage (\(O(N^2)\)).
- Distillation and quantization techniques reduce space without much performance loss.
10. Trade-offs in Advanced Perception
10.1 LiDAR vs. Camera vs. Radar
Method | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
LiDAR | High accuracy, great for 3D mapping. | Expensive, weather-sensitive. |
Camera | Color and texture information. | Poor depth perception, fails in low light. |
Radar | Works in all weather conditions. | Lower resolution compared to LiDAR. |
10.2 Liquid Neural Networks vs. Standard RNNs
Model | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Liquid Neural Networks | Adaptive, memory-efficient for dynamic inputs. | Slower training, needs specialized tuning. |
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) | Well-established, optimized for sequential data. | Struggles with long-term dependencies. |
10.3 Vision Transformers vs. Convolutional Neural Networks
Model | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Vision Transformers | Better long-range dependency capture, scalable. | Computationally expensive. |
CNNs | Efficient on small datasets, low-cost. | Struggles with global context. |
11. Optimizations & Variants
11.1 LiDAR Optimizations
Common Optimizations
- Point Cloud Downsampling: Reduces data size while preserving key features. Methods include:
- Voxel Grid Filtering
- Random Sampling
- Noise Reduction: Uses statistical outlier removal and median filtering.
- Compression Techniques: Octree-based compression reduces memory consumption.
- Efficient Search Structures: KD-Trees improve nearest neighbor searches from \(O(N^2)\) to \(O(N \log N)\).
Variants
- Solid-State LiDAR: Smaller, cheaper, and more robust than mechanical LiDAR.
- Flash LiDAR: Captures an entire scene in a single pulse, unlike traditional scanning.
11.2 Liquid Neural Networks Optimizations
Common Optimizations
- Sparse Connectivity: Reduces computation from \(O(N^2)\) to \(O(N \log N)\).
- Neural Pruning: Removes redundant neurons to enhance efficiency.
- Adaptive Time-Steps: Instead of fixed updates, time-step sizes change dynamically.
Variants
- Recurrent Liquid Neural Networks: Optimized for time-series data with better memory retention.
- Hybrid Liquid-CNN Models: Combine liquid neurons with CNNs for improved spatial-temporal processing.
11.3 Vision Transformers (ViTs) Optimizations
Common Optimizations
- Linear Attention Mechanisms: Reduces self-attention complexity from \(O(N^2 D)\) to \(O(ND)\).
- Patch Embedding Reduction: Uses larger patches to decrease token count.
- Distilled ViTs: Train smaller models using knowledge distillation.
Variants
- Data-Efficient ViTs: Work well with limited labeled data.
- Hybrid ViTs: Combine CNN feature extraction with Transformer architecture.
12. Iterative vs. Recursive Implementations
12.1 LiDAR Point Cloud Processing
Iterative Implementation (Efficient)
import open3d as o3d
# Load and process LiDAR data iteratively
def process_lidar(file):
point_cloud = o3d.io.read_point_cloud(file)
downsampled = point_cloud.voxel_down_sample(voxel_size=0.05) # Iterative downsampling
return downsampled
processed = process_lidar("sample.pcd")
o3d.visualization.draw_geometries([processed])
Recursive Implementation (Inefficient for Large Data)
def recursive_downsample(point_cloud, depth):
if depth == 0:
return point_cloud
return recursive_downsample(point_cloud.voxel_down_sample(0.05), depth - 1)
point_cloud = o3d.io.read_point_cloud("sample.pcd")
processed = recursive_downsample(point_cloud, 3)
o3d.visualization.draw_geometries([processed])
Efficiency Comparison
- Iterative: \(O(N)\) complexity, efficient memory usage.
- Recursive: Adds function call overhead, risk of stack overflow.
12.2 Liquid Neural Networks
Iterative Implementation
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
class LiquidNN(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, output_size):
super(LiquidNN, self).__init__()
self.hidden = nn.Linear(input_size, hidden_size)
self.output = nn.Linear(hidden_size, output_size)
def forward(self, x):
for _ in range(5): # Iterative updates
x = torch.tanh(self.hidden(x))
return self.output(x)
model = LiquidNN(1, 5, 1)
output = model(torch.tensor([[0.5]]))
print(output)
Recursive Implementation
def recursive_forward(model, x, depth):
if depth == 0:
return model.output(x)
x = torch.tanh(model.hidden(x))
return recursive_forward(model, x, depth - 1)
output = recursive_forward(model, torch.tensor([[0.5]]), 5)
print(output)
Efficiency Comparison
- Iterative: Efficient, direct weight updates.
- Recursive: High function call overhead, stack growth.
12.3 Vision Transformers
Iterative Implementation (Efficient)
from transformers import ViTForImageClassification, ViTFeatureExtractor
from PIL import Image
import torch
model = ViTForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
feature_extractor = ViTFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
image = Image.open("sample_image.jpg").convert("RGB")
inputs = feature_extractor(images=image, return_tensors="pt")
with torch.no_grad():
for _ in range(3): # Iterative forward passes
outputs = model(**inputs)
print(outputs.logits.argmax(-1).item())
Recursive Implementation (Inefficient)
def recursive_forward(model, inputs, depth):
if depth == 0:
return model(**inputs)
return recursive_forward(model, inputs, depth - 1)
output = recursive_forward(model, inputs, 3)
print(output.logits.argmax(-1).item())
Efficiency Comparison
- Iterative: Memory-efficient, optimized for GPU computation.
- Recursive: Unnecessary stack usage, no parallelism benefits.
13. Edge Cases & Failure Handling
13.1 Common Pitfalls and Edge Cases
LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging)
- High Noise in Data: Environmental conditions (rain, fog, snow) introduce noise.
- Occlusions & Shadow Regions: Some areas may be unscanned due to obstructions.
- Motion Distortion: Fast-moving objects cause point cloud misalignment.
- Sensor Saturation: Reflective surfaces (mirrors, water) lead to incorrect depth readings.
Liquid Neural Networks
- Vanishing Gradients: Recursive updates can cause very small gradients, making learning slow.
- Overfitting on Small Data: The model may memorize patterns instead of generalizing.
- Unstable Weights: Due to continuous dynamics, small perturbations can cause large deviations.
- Time-Varying Inputs: The model may fail if trained on static datasets but deployed in dynamic environments.
Vision Transformers (ViTs)
- Requires Large Datasets: Training from scratch needs extensive labeled data.
- Poor Generalization to Small Inputs: Patch embedding fails if input resolution changes significantly.
- Computational Overhead: Large memory requirements can lead to out-of-memory (OOM) errors.
- Misinterpretation of Textures: Unlike CNNs, ViTs may struggle with local textures in images.
14. Test Cases to Verify Correctness
14.1 LiDAR Testing
Test Case 1: Noisy Data Handling
import open3d as o3d
import numpy as np
# Create synthetic noisy point cloud
def test_noise_removal():
noisy_points = np.random.rand(1000, 3) * 100 # Random noise
pcd = o3d.geometry.PointCloud()
pcd.points = o3d.utility.Vector3dVector(noisy_points)
# Apply statistical outlier removal
filtered_pcd, _ = pcd.remove_statistical_outlier(nb_neighbors=20, std_ratio=2.0)
assert len(filtered_pcd.points) < len(pcd.points), "Noise filtering failed"
test_noise_removal()
14.2 Liquid Neural Networks Testing
Test Case 2: Gradient Stability
import torch
# Model with liquid neurons
class LiquidNN(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super().__init__()
self.hidden = torch.nn.Linear(1, 10)
self.output = torch.nn.Linear(10, 1)
def forward(self, x):
return self.output(torch.tanh(self.hidden(x)))
# Test stability of gradients
def test_gradient_stability():
model = LiquidNN()
input_tensor = torch.tensor([[0.5]], dtype=torch.float32, requires_grad=True)
output = model(input_tensor)
output.backward()
assert torch.all(input_tensor.grad.abs() < 10), "Unstable gradient detected"
test_gradient_stability()
14.3 Vision Transformer Testing
Test Case 3: Small Input Handling
from transformers import ViTForImageClassification, ViTFeatureExtractor
from PIL import Image
import torch
# Load model
model = ViTForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
feature_extractor = ViTFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
# Create tiny image
def test_small_image():
img = Image.new("RGB", (10, 10), (255, 255, 255)) # Very small image
inputs = feature_extractor(images=img, return_tensors="pt")
try:
outputs = model(**inputs)
except Exception as e:
assert "size mismatch" in str(e), "Small image handling failed"
test_small_image()
15. Real-World Failure Scenarios
15.1 LiDAR Failures
- Autonomous Vehicles in Fog: LiDAR struggles with low visibility conditions, leading to incomplete perception.
- Highly Reflective Surfaces: Causes false depth readings (e.g., glass buildings).
- Power Failures: Mechanical LiDARs require continuous power and may shut down mid-operation.
15.2 Liquid Neural Network Failures
- Unexpected Time-Varying Inputs: If deployed on real-world data with unseen patterns, the model may output unstable predictions.
- Overfitting in Anomaly Detection: If trained on limited anomalies, the network may fail to detect new ones.
- High Computational Overhead: In embedded systems, real-time inference may be too slow.
15.3 Vision Transformer Failures
- Adversarial Attacks: Small pixel changes can mislead ViTs into incorrect classifications.
- Low-Resolution Images: ViTs struggle if input image patches contain little information.
- Data Efficiency Issues: If not trained with sufficient data, ViTs perform worse than CNNs.
16. Real-World Applications & Industry Use Cases
16.1 LiDAR Applications
- Autonomous Vehicles: Used for 3D environment mapping, obstacle detection, and localization.
- Urban Planning & Mapping: Used in GIS for creating high-resolution maps.
- Robotics & Drones: Enables real-time SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping).
- Agriculture: Monitors crop health by detecting elevation differences in fields.
- Archaeology: Helps uncover lost civilizations through landscape scanning.
16.2 Liquid Neural Network Applications
- Adaptive AI in Edge Devices: Real-time applications like IoT, drones, and robotic control.
- Financial Market Prediction: Models dynamic time-series data for stock market forecasting.
- Healthcare: Analyzes EEG and ECG data for real-time patient monitoring.
- Cybersecurity: Detects anomalies in network traffic.
16.3 Vision Transformer Applications
- Medical Imaging: Enhances MRI and X-ray diagnostics.
- Satellite Image Processing: Analyzes earth observation data for climate change and urbanization studies.
- Autonomous Vehicles: Assists with road sign recognition, pedestrian detection, and scene understanding.
- Retail & E-Commerce: Improves product search and recommendation systems.
17. Open-Source Implementations
17.1 LiDAR Open-Source Libraries
- Open3D: http://www.open3d.org - A modern library for 3D data processing.
- Point Cloud Library (PCL): https://pointclouds.org/ - Provides algorithms for 3D point cloud processing.
- Autoware: https://github.com/autowarefoundation/autoware - An autonomous driving stack using LiDAR.
17.2 Liquid Neural Network Open-Source Implementations
- Liquid Time-Constant Networks (LTC): https://github.com/mlech26l/torch-ltc - PyTorch-based Liquid Neural Networks.
- MIT's Liquid Neural Networks: https://github.com/mlech26l/torch-liquid - Research-backed implementation.
17.3 Vision Transformer Open-Source Implementations
- Hugging Face ViT: https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/vit - Pre-trained Vision Transformers.
- Timm (PyTorch Image Models): https://github.com/rwightman/pytorch-image-models - Efficient ViT models.
18. Practical Project: Object Detection using LiDAR & Vision Transformers
18.1 Project Overview
This project integrates LiDAR with a Vision Transformer to detect objects in an outdoor environment, such as pedestrians and vehicles.
18.2 Implementation Steps
- Capture 3D point cloud data using LiDAR.
- Use Open3D to preprocess the point cloud (filter noise and segment objects).
- Capture a 2D image of the same scene.
- Use a Vision Transformer (ViT) to classify objects in the 2D image.
- Fuse both modalities to improve object detection.
18.3 Code Implementation
Step 1: Load & Preprocess LiDAR Data
import open3d as o3d
import numpy as np
# Load LiDAR point cloud
point_cloud = o3d.io.read_point_cloud("sample.pcd")
# Downsample to reduce noise
downsampled_pcd = point_cloud.voxel_down_sample(voxel_size=0.05)
# Segment objects
plane_model, inliers = downsampled_pcd.segment_plane(distance_threshold=0.02, ransac_n=3, num_iterations=1000)
segmented_objects = downsampled_pcd.select_by_index(inliers, invert=True)
# Visualize results
o3d.visualization.draw_geometries([segmented_objects])
Step 2: Classify Objects using Vision Transformers
from transformers import ViTFeatureExtractor, ViTForImageClassification
from PIL import Image
import torch
# Load pre-trained Vision Transformer
model = ViTForImageClassification.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
feature_extractor = ViTFeatureExtractor.from_pretrained("google/vit-base-patch16-224")
# Load image
image = Image.open("scene.jpg").convert("RGB")
# Preprocess image
inputs = feature_extractor(images=image, return_tensors="pt")
# Predict objects
with torch.no_grad():
outputs = model(**inputs)
predicted_class = outputs.logits.argmax(-1).item()
print(f"Detected object class: {predicted_class}")
Step 3: Fusion of LiDAR & Vision Transformer Data
def fuse_data(lidar_objects, image_objects):
fusion_dict = {}
for i, obj in enumerate(lidar_objects):
fusion_dict[f"LiDAR_Object_{i}"] = image_objects
return fusion_dict
# Example fusion
lidar_objects = ["Vehicle", "Pedestrian"]
image_objects = ["Person", "Car"]
fusion_result = fuse_data(lidar_objects, image_objects)
print(fusion_result)
18.4 Expected Output
- 3D objects extracted from LiDAR.
- Detected object classes from Vision Transformer.
- Final fusion result mapping 3D objects to recognized categories.
18.5 Future Enhancements
- Use YOLO + ViT for more robust object detection.
- Enhance LiDAR object segmentation using deep learning.
- Implement multi-sensor fusion (LiDAR + Radar + Cameras).
19. Competitive Programming & System Design Integration
19.1 Competitive Programming with Advanced Perception
- LiDAR-Based Computational Geometry: Algorithms for point cloud processing in high-dimensional spaces.
- Liquid Neural Networks for Time-Series Analysis: Dynamic AI-driven solutions for pattern recognition tasks.
- Vision Transformers for Image Processing Challenges: Efficient handling of high-dimensional vision tasks.
19.2 System Design Integration
Use Case: Autonomous Vehicle Perception Stack
- LiDAR: 3D point cloud mapping for real-time navigation.
- Liquid Neural Networks: Adaptive control logic for dynamic decision-making.
- Vision Transformers: Real-time object classification and semantic segmentation.
Scalability Considerations
- Microservices Architecture: Distribute perception tasks across independent services.
- Edge Computing: Offload real-time AI computations to specialized hardware.
- Data Caching & Preprocessing: Minimize redundant computations in LiDAR processing.
20. Assignments
20.1 Solve At Least 10 Problems Using These Algorithms
Problem Set:
- LiDAR Data Filtering: Remove noise from a point cloud dataset.
- 3D Object Segmentation: Implement RANSAC-based plane segmentation.
- Path Planning: Use A* search to navigate through a LiDAR-mapped environment.
- Time-Series Forecasting: Train a Liquid Neural Network to predict stock market trends.
- Sensor Fusion: Integrate LiDAR and camera data for improved detection.
- Image Classification with ViT: Train a Vision Transformer to classify images.
- Object Detection Pipeline: Combine CNNs and ViTs for robust perception.
- Real-Time AI Inference: Optimize a Liquid Neural Network for edge deployment.
- Multi-Modal Learning: Build a model that fuses LiDAR, images, and radar.
- Efficient Processing: Optimize a LiDAR-based system for real-time applications.
20.2 Use in a System Design Problem
Scenario: Smart City Surveillance System
- Problem: Design a surveillance system that monitors traffic, detects anomalies, and ensures pedestrian safety.
- Solution:
- Use LiDAR for real-time 3D object tracking.
- Apply Liquid Neural Networks for adaptive incident detection.
- Leverage Vision Transformers for high-accuracy image analysis.
- Design Considerations:
- Scalability: Can handle multiple intersections simultaneously.
- Latency: Uses edge computing for real-time alerts.
- Reliability: Incorporates redundant data sources (CCTV, LiDAR, sensors).
20.3 Implement Under Time Constraints
- Competitive Challenge: Implement an efficient LiDAR processing pipeline within 1 hour.
- Hackathon Scenario: Deploy a Vision Transformer model for real-time facial recognition in under 3 hours.
- AI Model Optimization Task: Train a Liquid Neural Network in 30 minutes on live time-series data.